<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.oehive.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The OpenEdge Hive - bug</title>
 <link>http://www.oehive.org/taxonomy/term/192/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>oehive</language>
<item>
 <title>nohardcodeemail.p bug?</title>
 <link>http://www.oehive.org/node/1524</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If hard coded email is found in an include file, this rule shows the original procedure as source.&lt;br /&gt;
E.g. if I have procedure proc.p which is&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;/* proc.p body */&lt;br /&gt;
/* ... some code */&lt;br /&gt;
{inc.i}&lt;br /&gt;
/* ... some code */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hard coded email is in inc.i&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though proLint will show me that source is proc.p, not inc.i. The line will be the correct line in inc.i&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Attached is a changed rule, which seems to work fine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yuri&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;og_rss_groups&quot;&gt;&lt;ul class=&quot;links&quot;&gt;&lt;li  class=&quot;first last og_links&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/prolint&quot; class=&quot;og_links&quot;&gt;Prolint&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.oehive.org/node/1524#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.oehive.org/taxonomy/term/105">Prolint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.oehive.org/taxonomy/term/192">bug</category>
 <category domain="http://www.oehive.org/taxonomy/term/635">nohardcodeemail</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.oehive.org/files/nohardcodeemail.p" length="3902" type="text/x-pascal" />
 <group domain="http://www.oehive.org/prolint">Prolint</group>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Yuri</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1524 at http://www.oehive.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How about an &quot;official bug&quot; section?</title>
 <link>http://www.oehive.org/node/629</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As you probably know, Progress Software doesn&#039;t list most of the known bugs of the latest OpenEdge version.&lt;br /&gt;
I sometimes waste a couple of hours (...days) on something, make a call to Progress tech support just to know from them that my problem is due to a bug they already know about.&lt;br /&gt;
From my calls to tech support, I also get a new &quot;official&quot; bug number for new bugs that they didn&#039;t knew about (including documentation bugs (&quot;doc bugs&quot;) i.e. something in the documentation that is wrong or too incomplete... this too causes to loose precious time sometimes).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How about having a new Hive sectio&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oehive.org/node/629&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.oehive.org/node/629#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.oehive.org/taxonomy/term/85">Hive group</category>
 <category domain="http://www.oehive.org/taxonomy/term/192">bug</category>
 <category domain="http://www.oehive.org/taxonomy/term/193">official</category>
 <category domain="http://www.oehive.org/taxonomy/term/194">tech support</category>
 <category domain="http://www.oehive.org/taxonomy/term/195">technical support</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dlauzon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">629 at http://www.oehive.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
